The texts can be rephrased in several ways. Here, I offer two alternatives.1. By and large, low-flow fixtures represent a direct and effective route to conserving water. Using them, a household can direct a steady stream of H2O to where atmospheric pressure and gravitational pull ensure that the liquid falls, flows, or runs to where it is of the most use, without any noticeable difference in performance from the old fixtures. We're talking, by the way, not only about how much comes out of the end of the fixture but also how much goes down the drain when what should be going in (or should be staying in) is just that: going in or staying in. We're also not talking just about how much goes into the anything-but-efficiency side of your water heater. Conserving hot water also gives the low-flow route a good E in ESG. Reduced water usage results in money savings, wide-scale conservation of a valuable resource, and much less pressure on local water treatment plants and the ecosystems that flank them.2. The installations you want to choose will have a direct and effective impact on water conservation. Why? Because when you use them, you direct a steady stream of H2O to where atmospheric pressure and gravitational pull ensure that the liquid falls, flows, or runs to where it does the most good. (And where it does the most good, I'm hewing to plumbing engineering here, is near fixtures that are designed to be, near-to-narrative, low-flow version of themselves.) The term "low-flow" is a bit of a misnomer, by the way. We're talking not just about how much comes out of the end of the fixture, but also how much stays in when it should be going out.